I viewed this film when it was first screened in theaters. Unlike many other films, this one remained memorable, the reason being the threads of morality woven through the plot-line. If one views the film through the eyes of "moral judgement", i.e. as the average person in society might, there are many interesting facets to this film. It is a little difficult to make specific points without revealing plot, but in general terms, the audience is at multiple points shown moral dilemmas encountered by this convent teacher. We, as the audience, may at those same points hold particular judgements about the decisions and actions of this teacher. Is what she is doing morally justified?We are initially shown a women in a very laudible profession, that of a teacher, in a convent, no less. Then we learn that she engages in what seem to immoral acts, but then we discover she is doing it help someone else, a crippled brother (if memory serves correctly). Then another plot twist again presents what seems like another immoral act or situation, and again we find a moral 'justification' for why she is doing it. We see perhaps 3 or 4 such moral cross-roads throughout the film.So the teacher has breached morals on multiple occasion in order to elicit what she perceives to be a 'greater good'.Late in the film, the teacher is again presented with another moral dilemma, this time a huge one. Should she take part in an immoral act that has been asked of her by the man she has fallen in love with?These are the moral twists and turns that I am referring to. Watching the movie from this perspective reveals some very interesting moral judgements and invites us to reflect on our own morals and our own judgements, not only of others, but also of ourselves.